Some thoughts on origins…..

I leached the following from another of my rather lame websites……I plagiarize myself………….

When I was a child of elementary-school age, my thoughts were, I believe, sometimes different from those of my peers. I remember thinking about nothingness; I tried to wrap my weird little mind around this abstraction, but could not quite get the cerebral ‘fingers’ of my left and right brain to reach far enough around this curious concept to touch. I attempted to imagine a ‘universeless reality’, a void with no time, space, matter, or energy. Reality, or more appropriately the lack of, would then be less than black and empty. I think that I should now conclude reminiscing over my prepubescent mental gymnastics.

Where this train of thought leads, in the final analysis, is to the question of why there is something here rather than nothing. The options are thus: The universe either created itself, or is infinite in age, or was bought into existence by some Entity greater than the universe. Drilling down a bit further, the question becomes, “Is there a God?”

I make no claims to being an academic; I assert, however, that a thoughtful layperson can reach reasonable conclusions to profound questions that, while they may counter the status quo, are defensible without having to resort to blind leaps of faith. Thus begins the journey. Our initial vehicle for this journey is science. Because science `requires’ a naturalistic explanation for natural phenomena, there exists an `a priori’ bias towards materialism, and this is as it should be.

Science, however, can only take us so far in our journey. In fact, science, in regards to `first things,’ does not take us to the beginning. Science is methodology. Science is hypothesis, experimentation and repetition of experimentation, observation of phenomena. Science insists that a theory be falsifiable. To speculate on historical, non-repeatable events such as the origin of life, or the origin of matter and energy, whether it be by Devine Fiat or by natural processes, is an exercise in metaphysics. Creation and evolution are not repeatable events; they were not observed by humanity. To declare evolution or creationism as fact betrays a misunderstanding of the scientific process or is an attempt to intimidate those who dissent and dare question the orthodoxy.

Hearkening back to the initial premise, I must state that I find it hard to separate, in my mind, the quest for God from the quest for the origins of life.

Published in: on December 20, 2007 at 5:21 pm Comments (3)
Tags: , , ,

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://mondoron.wordpress.com/2007/12/20/some-thoughts-on-origins/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

3 Comments Leave a comment.

  1. Just to stir the pot a bit. I think both sides of the argument vastly over estimate what we know and don’t know.

    Let’s take a scale that goes from zero to everything there is to know. At this point and time, I’d say we just got off zerod where we know a little more right than we know that’s wrong.

    This is as opposed to two or three thousand years ago where most of what was known was probably wrong. I mean taking a bath once a year or using leeches is right isn’t it.

    I’m amazed at what’s been learned in just the past two or three years because of the Hubble and deep space telescopes. Just this year they disproved Einstien’s theory that the universe is curved.

    We are just starting to get a handle on DNA which might provide a better proof than fossil records. Just this year, they discovered that the DNA of humans is 5 times more diverse than they thought. They’ve also found less similarity in DNA between Chimps and people.

    So, relax.. Smoke if you got em..and when the smoke clears everything might be self-evident.

  2. Ah, epistemology and science…….

    Steve, I think you and I could have an interesting conversation over a cup of coffee or a beer. All in all, biology is a fairly mature science. This is not to say that there are gaps in our knowledge, but give credit where credit is due.

    By the way and quite off-topic, I am not a young earth creationist, nor is my understanding of origins locked into a literal interpretation of the first two chapters of Genesis. I could ramble on for hours, but I need another cup of coffee and I have to go to work, now ;-)

  3. Well for some important news!

    Dunkin Donuts is now selling its coffee in stores. I wonder if we’re going to be able to buy the 10 pound bag at Costco.

    I invite you over to my blog to look at my real interest with is how people really learn. I’ve been posting some really good videos. http://www.learningatlightspeed.wordpress.com it can be viewed with regular or decaf


Leave a Comment