I have listened to the criticisms arrayed against intelligent design (ID) and have given them some thought. The two primary complaints against ID are thus: one, ID is merely a slick repackaging of creationism, and two, ID is built on the ‘god-of-the-gaps’ argument.
First, creationism, be it ‘scientific’ or not, is primarily an issue of biblical hermeneutics. Creationism starts and ends with the first eleven chapters of Genesis. I am not making a statement about the veracity of the biblical account of creationism. What I am inferring, to reiterate, is that creationism is wed to one interpretation of the biblical creation narrative. In contrast, ID is divorced from any text of antiquity. (more…)